Tim's for a Friend

Deleted • 2 May 2012 at 8:59 PM

I was just thinking what if we could also send our friend's creatures to be reserved for at Tim's? Maybe there could be some limits since they're not your creatures, anyway. This was due to me having trouble feeding a dying cove once (the happiness meter keeps going back to 0 every day).

Probably not all of you would like the idea, though. As always, just suggesting.

Deleted • 2 May 2012 at 9:01 PM

@gunnhild

This is a great idea!! 😃 I agree there would have to be some limits, as it's not your cove, but that would make it sooooo much easier to keep inactive users' creatures alive! 😃

Deleted • 3 May 2012 at 6:14 AM

@rosieforever

Geez thank you very much for that~ ^.^ Glad to know that the suggestion is doing well ^.^

magenta • 3 May 2012 at 6:16 AM

@Gunnhhild I love it! 😊 Its Convenient and can keep your friends dying cove Perked up and ALIVE 😃

zafeyry • 3 May 2012 at 6:24 AM

@gunnhhild
Sorry, I don't like it ☹️ People should be responsible for their own creatures.

lillia • 3 May 2012 at 6:35 AM

@gunnhild

i agree its a good suggestion,
but frankly speaking,i think this can be good and bad.

if the user's friend is willing to comeback, its a good option for their cove to keep alive

but because theres some people making the organisation to keep the pets happy (even though the user has quit for long long time)

if theres a new update like this, the rarity for the creature will never change, therefore, the LE will remain cheap, and new comers who have no CC will have no chance to trade something to get better creature.

at the same time, the happiness meter will have no use because eggcave wants eggs owners to come check in here often, for us all to play here, not to leave the egg cave and to be taken by others.

but its also good because some people loses their appetite to play eggcave when they see their creature dying, and im sad seeing many old users loose their interest to play the eggcave anymore.

but also, its so sad to see good creatures & names left out with 0 happiness just because they are immortal, and users has not came back in 1-2 years and so.

.. which is nothing to do with tims suggestion anymore xD
but still xD

Deleted • 3 May 2012 at 6:38 AM

@lillia

I completely agree with you so that's why I was thinking that some limitations could come in if chances are that this suggestion could be approved. >.<

lillia • 3 May 2012 at 6:42 AM

@gunnhild

❤️3333

thanks for agreeing, and yah it would be awsome, if theres any good limitation idea @v@