Forum Signature

fakeworld • 30 June 2012 at 11:26 AM

I think she should be able to have signatures.

"It should be one that you enjoyed creating where it has an image of interest . one that you edited and took your time , should be simple and clean . over doing with effects isn't that great , and having a C4D/PNG in it isn't that amazing when put into a image that is 500x150 px to the max."

We should be able to insert images in our signatures, we could maybe have eggs with our username, whatever we feel as though we need to use our signature for.

It's a lot more to this, if you don't quite understand just let me know, id try to explain more. 😊

kalateevolk • 30 June 2012 at 11:31 AM

@fakeworld

The problem is our small character length while writing. A signature would only make that small amount less. Plus all the pictures on the forums would take away from the art we already have. There is no need for signatures. You prophile is good enough 😊

fakeworld • 30 June 2012 at 11:40 AM

@Kalateevolk So true, but adjustments, etc can be made. I'm not saying change the whole forums, but making the character length longer wouldn't be a problem would it? If not, do you think it'll still be a problem.
Now for the art, etc. I understand, but if it's not their art, why would they simply steal it to use it in their 'own' siggy. I believe they should be giving the 'permission' first. What's prophile?

kalateevolk • 30 June 2012 at 11:41 AM

No, I mean it's taking away from the purpose of eggcave. We admire their art! It will take away from what they have already done here.

chibidarkness • 30 June 2012 at 11:42 AM

I think a signature is a great idea, but only if it's small bits of text, no images. I don't want Egg Cave assaulted with huge picture files, it takes away a bit of order.

kalateevolk • 30 June 2012 at 11:50 AM

@chibidarkness

Exactly!

fakeworld • 30 June 2012 at 11:56 AM

@kalateevolk @chibidarkness Of course it wouldn't be huge pictures files, etc. It can be a limit for how big images and text can be. Maybe the whole signature adding together can be 400x200. That's quite small, I think without an unique image, signatures would be useless.

pipkitten • 30 June 2012 at 12:01 PM

In all honesty, I don't think we need signatures.
Pictures would disrupt the nice flow forum posts have.
And if you're going for text, that's pretty much what your status is for. Just type whatever there.

chibidarkness • 30 June 2012 at 12:53 PM

@fakeworld

No, I really don't think images, how small they can be, would fit. It's just wouldn't be really pretty if it were to come true.