Immortal creatures shouldnt lose health?

in Site Feedback & Ideas

Deleted • 16 August 2011 at 12:33 AM

@Cubexline

Yeah, i support.

Deleted • 16 August 2011 at 12:35 AM

@cubexline i agree

Other
3,224 posts

     

pipkitten • 16 August 2011 at 12:37 AM

@Cubexline: I support this~ 😊

Female
2,344 posts

     

nkiay • 16 August 2011 at 12:37 AM

Support!

Female
970 posts

     

candy_girl_1298 • 16 August 2011 at 12:38 AM

@cubexline i support. that was true at first, then ian took it away for some reason 0.o

Female
2,061 posts

     

cubexline • 16 August 2011 at 12:39 AM

@candy_girl_1298: Really? o.o didnt notice lol

1,655 posts

     

chatial • 16 August 2011 at 12:40 AM

It's not health though, It's happiness.
And if you don't feed them , they'll lose it.
I don't think it should be changed.
I don't think that just because their level 2000 means that they don't get sad from not being fed.

4,672 posts

     

icymuffin • 16 August 2011 at 12:44 AM

Then you wouldn't be able to tell which users are active or not

I'm pretty sure there was this one other reason why this wasn't supported, but I forgot xD

Female
2,061 posts

     

cubexline • 16 August 2011 at 12:45 AM

@chatial: health, happiness, its all similar to me lol
but if you think on it, it doesnt make sense if its immortal it still loses health(happiness)
Its just weird/I dont like it lol

1,655 posts

     

chatial • 16 August 2011 at 12:46 AM

@cubexline
I mean, I think it's enough that they don't die...
Having them healthy and happy makes others know your taking care of your eggs.
Instead of neglecting them because their on a high level.

Female
4,589 posts

     

crescentfeather • 16 August 2011 at 12:56 AM

@chatial Exactly. Also, I hate that people are starving their immortals. ☚ī¸

1,655 posts

     

chatial • 16 August 2011 at 12:57 AM

@crescentfeather
Haha, I put mine in Tim's. (x
Silly starving pixels.

Female
4,589 posts

     

crescentfeather • 16 August 2011 at 12:58 AM

@chatial I know... but it still bothers me to see them hungry. ☚ī¸

Female
249 posts

     

chibiloki88 • 16 August 2011 at 1:18 AM

i still havent tested this immortal thing. i liked the idea of them not being able to be put in tims (bc i never pay attention to that). i like the idea of having an option so you can de-select your immortals when putting them in tims. but i think i agree with the comments here; checking on people's immortals somewhat indicates how committed they are to their cove. common eggs are also a good indicator. if their immortals are happy, you know they really take care of things. not saying they wouldnt otherwise. just agreeing 😃 i think it would somewhat defeat the purpose of egg cave if, when reaching level 2000, there was no point in interacting with the creature anymore. just my opinion though 😊

Female
1,186 posts

     

lbowe_elbow • 16 August 2011 at 1:39 AM

@cubexline

I do not agree

there has to be some reason for you to use tims, or to feed your eggs once their over 2000

Feeding eggs is one of the main parts of the site

Female
1,096 posts

     

leopardclaws • 17 August 2011 at 12:53 PM

I agree with Lbowe, if Ian were to let them have immortal happiness too, there wouldn't really be a point to the game.

Female
2,307 posts

     

lizardfeather • 17 August 2011 at 1:40 PM

Yea I agree with lbowe too 😸

Eventhoughidontputmyimmortalsintims 😈

Reply