Register
icymuffin • 23 November 2011 at 12:04 AM
BAgreeing with orderedchaos, dionaea, smilies, & _icarlyrocks_55No other explination shall be attempted to be given at this point in time x3*headdesk*
space • 23 November 2011 at 5:23 AM
B.NO NO NO.It kills the fun about eggcave >(
balletninja • 23 November 2011 at 8:09 AM
C. Maybe two onnies can breed and make a new creature?
haunted • 23 November 2011 at 8:38 AM
A sounds fun !
seaangel • 23 November 2011 at 8:51 AM
a
crescentfeather • 23 November 2011 at 10:53 AM
ACertain restrictions would be good.
yogurt • 23 November 2011 at 10:57 AM
B
cheese-itz • 23 November 2011 at 11:06 AM
A
cqpkytty • 23 November 2011 at 11:09 AM
@_icarlyrocks_55The only other breeding poll I know of made by me. It died. I was the last poster, so I can't even bump ☹️
witchcraft • 23 November 2011 at 5:04 PM
@cqpkytty A. BUT I think it would be better if:-One creature can only breed with the same species.-The rarer the pet, the more money it costs.-FAIRLY RARE creatures can only breed ONCE.-SUPER RARE CREATURES CAN NOT BREED.That way, the rarity will NOT be messed up. 😉
ceres14 • 23 November 2011 at 8:45 PM
B it would make the values of creatures drop
han • 25 November 2011 at 7:09 AM
B- if we all had 150 creatures, Egg Cave wouldn't be fun anymore. and sort of..A- if we could breed different animals together and find new species, it would be A
himitsutenshin • 25 November 2011 at 7:46 AM
B ☹️
cqpkytty • 25 November 2011 at 8:05 PM
...does anyone else have an opinion?
jewelz • 25 November 2011 at 8:12 PM
C
syndrome • 25 November 2011 at 8:13 PM
A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
cqpkytty • 25 November 2011 at 8:41 PM
...anyone else?