Foo weighted rarity

in General

Female
381 posts

     

shadielle • 2 January 2012 at 6:55 PM

Is it just me or has anyone else noticed that the weighted rarity of the foo decreased from 50 to 44 between yesterday and today?😱 I don't find it possible seeing so many foos dying in 2 days! o.O

I don't know about the roo and the florn but I think their weighted rarity is still the same.

495 posts

     

eclipse • 2 January 2012 at 6:56 PM

There are always those newbies 😋

Female
3,089 posts

     

rawrcookies08 • 2 January 2012 at 6:56 PM

@shadielle Maybe they didn't die, maybe it was just that they get rarer every day. 😉

Female
1,043 posts

     

gvantsa • 2 January 2012 at 6:58 PM

Secret Foo massacre? Q.Q

Deleted • 2 January 2012 at 6:58 PM

@shadielle the truth may sound cruel, but it might be good if the weighted rarity starts to decrease, so people who got agitated over the rerelease might relax... ^^" but indent doubt it, if somebody has more than one foo, and then let's them starve, then those foo die. There's thousands of users, a drop page by 6 is probably going to be minor then what's in store next D:

Female
381 posts

     

shadielle • 2 January 2012 at 6:58 PM

@rawrcookies08 I don't think the weighted rarity is based on the days... if it was, it would happen the same with the roo and florn and other creatures, right 😉

5,632 posts

     

linpug • 2 January 2012 at 6:59 PM

51-44 ^^

Female
3,089 posts

     

rawrcookies08 • 2 January 2012 at 6:59 PM

@shadielle IDK.. hm. 😋

Female
381 posts

     

shadielle • 2 January 2012 at 6:59 PM

@iridescent Yeah that sounds more likely... but still, it decreased a lot☹️

Deleted • 2 January 2012 at 7:00 PM

@shadielle I know, it's sad ._. It's like getting a gift, but then a part of the gift breaks D':

Female
6,833 posts

     

whitefall • 2 January 2012 at 7:01 PM

Ooh! I've noticed this.
Before the Foo was released, I think they were in the low 30s. But then they were rerelease, so the rarity readdress and weighted rarity became 60.

Also, @Ian had a lot of Foos and he downsized a bit, so I'm pretty sure he deleted them or something xD That must've made some difference 😸

Yep, Foo major deaths are possible with newbies... *-*

Female
381 posts

     

shadielle • 2 January 2012 at 7:02 PM

@iridescent Totally☹️ I mean people were supposed to take good care of their foos, since it was the dream of most users here on egg cave.

5,632 posts

     

linpug • 2 January 2012 at 7:03 PM

They were 27 😉 Then they went to 51 then to 50, then to 44! 😊 I keep an eye on them everyday! (I draw them a lot)

Female
381 posts

     

shadielle • 2 January 2012 at 7:03 PM

@linpug Yeah it was initially 51 but a few days later it decreased to 50;) I keep an eye on them everyday too, they're my fav species😃

2,425 posts

     

blackrose_chan • 2 January 2012 at 7:03 PM

I DID NOTHING!!!!! (even though I had same plan for Niphas, prath, garos, and bessys <,<)

Female
1,043 posts

     

gvantsa • 2 January 2012 at 7:04 PM

Oh yeah I forgot about Ian's Foos. That could be why... they're not all changed though.

Deleted • 2 January 2012 at 7:04 PM

@shadielle I know, and some people offered their whole coves for just one ☹️

Female
916 posts

     

darcy_vasquez • 2 January 2012 at 7:05 PM

Some newbies maybe thought they were common cave eggs and let them starve, like happened in Dec 2009. A lot of people thought they were common and let them die, or leave them and that's why the became so rare.

Maybe the weighed rarity had an error, or thousands of Foo died :'(

Female
381 posts

     

shadielle • 2 January 2012 at 7:06 PM

@gvantsa Yeah that might be the reason😊

Female
4,589 posts

     

crescentfeather • 2 January 2012 at 7:10 PM

People stealing illegal Foos might have been caught.

Reply