A thought that I think

in Site Feedback & Ideas

Non-binary
1,178 posts

     

cynt5100 • 2 April 2012 at 5:10 PM

S000000, I (yes me. Right here) have been thinking. I see alot of times people put in the creature profiles of creatures: mate= blahdiblah. So, I thought that maybee if you take cc, and you have the creatures in your cove, they can produce new eggs of the same creature. It's cool right?

(voice your opinion, but don't be flat out rude. I know it might not work, but it's just a random Idea. Give your rude critisium a break please. [not saying many people are rude, but some are])

7,923 posts

     

hayz • 2 April 2012 at 5:12 PM

No thanks.

The rarity would drop and Tines would RULE THE WEB!

I'm content with the Yeeps, thank you very much. :0

Female
1,197 posts

     

snow_angel618 • 2 April 2012 at 5:12 PM

@cynt5100 so, you mean that you can breed to creatures to get a new one? that could actually be cool, but it would be hard for the site people to come up with a program like that...there has to be artwork, you know, and that takes time. It's a cool idea though, it would be awesome if it worked 😸

Female
1,938 posts

     

cotton • 2 April 2012 at 5:21 PM

It would be awesome, way better than when some people expect hybrids out of breeding and such. 😱 One or the other is much better.

But, it would cause rarities to drop. It would have to cost a lot of CC.

@Ian

Non-binary
1,178 posts

     

cynt5100 • 2 April 2012 at 5:24 PM

@snow_angel618 more like you can take a male and a female hatched creatures of the same breed, and you can make another one of the same breed for 700 cc. for example, Zanele and Anistasia in my cove. they fit the requirements (except for hatched) and I make them have a kid egg. Then I name it.

Female
1,197 posts

     

snow_angel618 • 2 April 2012 at 5:25 PM

@cynt5100 ooooh...so like two onnies make an onny? i think the rarity would drop XD

Female
1,938 posts

     

cotton • 2 April 2012 at 5:26 PM

@snow_angel618 @cynt5100 How about the rarer the creature is, the more CC it costs? 😸

Female
1,197 posts

     

snow_angel618 • 2 April 2012 at 5:27 PM

@cotton yeah i guess, but still... '~'

Female
1,938 posts

     

cotton • 2 April 2012 at 5:28 PM

@snow_angel618 Yeah, it would still be a problem >~<

Female
1,197 posts

     

snow_angel618 • 2 April 2012 at 5:28 PM

@cotton it's a good idea though 😊 i just think rarity would be too low and it breaks my heart to think a tine could be treated as a common

Female
454 posts

     

doll • 2 April 2012 at 5:40 PM

@cynt5100

To prevent people from complaining about how they worked so hard and spent so much money to get that certain creature, how about breeding has to cost the amount of CC that the creature is currently worth? That would make it fair.

Deleted • 2 April 2012 at 5:45 PM

Actually many people have had this idea before an it is always rejected. It does drop the rarity of creatures and makes the cave almost obsolete because people would just breed instead of trying to catch eggs. 😊 it's a very unique and interesting idea.

Gender Fluid
3,907 posts

     

dreamer • 2 April 2012 at 5:47 PM

There's this thought I'm thinking though I should think through this thought thoroughly, although the thought was thought with thorough thinking.

LOL sorry.

Ehh, not a big fan of the idea. Rarity would go down.

Female
515 posts

     

ieatburgers • 2 April 2012 at 6:33 PM

Sorry, I don't really like this idea. I mean, I'm a fan of games where we get to breed and make family trees and or that, but if we can breed then I don't see the point of collecting commons. 😊 Because I can just breed my tasmas like crazy.

Reply