100% happiness for immortal creatures suggestion

lwarlen • 26 July 2012 at 10:15 PM

Have you ever immortalized a creature and didn't put it in tim's for a few days? Then you come back to see your companion at 0% happiness and you're so warm hearted that you cannot bear to see them like that. But you do not want to spend your extra EC on your pet.

I'm sorry if someone posted it already.


#Happinessforimmortals

fakeworld • 26 July 2012 at 10:17 PM

#Happinessforimmortals
Most people don't feed them because they can't die. I don't understand why. Id spend my last. 😊
@Lwarlen

lwarlen • 26 July 2012 at 10:21 PM

@fakeworld but there are people who don't like seeing the creatures at 0% happiness. At the beginning when immortals started some people didn't like to see them like that and that is why you can put them in tim's.

spirithawk • 26 July 2012 at 10:25 PM

@lwarlen Good idea, 100 is better than 0! Even if my creature is immortal, I feed it anyway, I mean, why not feed it? It gives you EC!

Deleted • 26 July 2012 at 11:14 PM

@lwarlen
I honestly don't mind seeing them at 0% happiness, because I know they'll stay alive and well. Happiness holds no meaning to me after level 2000.

However, it would make more sense. The creatures are immortal because they can gather food for themselves, correct? So it makes no sense for them to stay at 0% happiness ...

mrsgiggles • 27 July 2012 at 4:05 AM

YES! I burn close to 1 million EC every time it's time to feed the slaves at @Gibbymodok.