Register
trig • 5 October 2014 at 9:32 AM
Recently, there's this (maybe more than one?) program that's been getting widespread use to gain views, clicks, and feeds.I applaud users who use that and keep up with the program - it sounds very hard to do so.However, I think there should be a maximum amount of views/clicks/feeds per month. I've seen this on other sites too (where they limit clicks per day).Perhaps we could do 10,000 views/clicks/feeds.Yes or no? Please vote and ping.@windchill@sparklefox@chocovampire@kisamari@birggitt
windchill • 5 October 2014 at 9:37 AM
@trig Are you refering to the click exchange?
sparklefox • 5 October 2014 at 10:24 AM
@trig - You don't gain stats through the Leaderboards. At least, I don't think. I guess you're referring to the Click Exchange.You can limit the amount of feeds/clicks/views each creature you have in it yourself, when you're putting them in.
chocovampire • 5 October 2014 at 10:31 AM
@trig I think you're talking about the sites that help to gain views clicks and feeds?I personally think that doesn't cause any problem, and I don't really care if I get the most clicks/feeds that month.
trig • 5 October 2014 at 1:03 PM
@windchill@sparklefox@chocovampireNo, not limit the Click Exchange.For example: If you get 7000 clicks per month, that's fine. But if you get the maximum of 10,000 clicks that month, anything over that would not be counted.
fakeworld • 6 October 2014 at 4:32 PM
@trig This would be unfair. Why limit the views, feeds or either clicks someome creature receives due to them earning a massive amount of stats?
trig • 6 October 2014 at 4:40 PM
@fakeworldMy argument is that nowadays, people can easily break into the LBs in a few weeks rather than years compared to other users.In a sense, it's not very fair.
fakeworld • 6 October 2014 at 4:53 PM
@trig I can understand your perspective, but I wouldn't consider that unfair. It's just that we all have our own ways of earning stats, and some ways just aren't as effective as others.