Register
kschr26 • 2 September 2015 at 10:48 PM
@raitonchidori Ok, thanks for responding!😸
hayleysmith • 4 September 2015 at 4:07 AM
@raitonchidori I think this is a fabulous idea 😃 it would make life so much easier to just look through all lots 😊
raitonchidori • 16 September 2015 at 9:37 PM
@hayleysmith exactly! I just hope @Ian thinks the same. I don't think it would give a lot of trouble to be done. A bit of work, maybe... And would really (really, really) make our lives easily here.
kaiserbakura • 17 September 2015 at 6:30 PM
@raitonchidori I like this idea. It makes it easier to find creatures with a wishlist of something you actually have.I 'm pretty sure there is a 30 day limit on both creature and item trades, after that they automatically get took down.
raitonchidori • 17 September 2015 at 7:20 PM
@kaiserbakura I didn't know that. Thanks for the info. Well, yeah, completing wishlist would be much better.
ladysaphire • 28 September 2015 at 8:04 PM
@raitonchidori That would be so perfect! Sometimes I go to the end of the page to pass it, but then I remember that there's no how y.ySeveral pages at trade center is an wonderful idea!
queens • 29 September 2015 at 5:38 AM
@raitonchidoriThis would be nice, no one ever offers on my trades so it'd be nice if there was a way they could actually find them.
destinyrose • 29 September 2015 at 1:22 PM
I think this is a very good idea
raitonchidori • 29 September 2015 at 1:59 PM
@ladysaphire, @queens and @destinyrose thanks for supporting this! I'm sure if it gets made. It will help everybody here. (Still don't know why 3 people voted No. I would seriously like they to come here and tell their reasons. It would be interesting to the topic discussion).
madscienced • 29 September 2015 at 2:00 PM
I totally agree with this! i like to look through trades, so this would make things easier.
barbyka • 29 September 2015 at 4:08 PM
@raitonchidori I agree that I could easily live without 15 newest trades. I much prefer the auction listing. And I would again like to suggest searching by what other people are looking for. Example: I've decided to trade a Tific. I can go and see if someone has made a lot and is looking for it in the TC. Then I can offer if I like the lot or negotiate a good offer.
raitonchidori • 29 September 2015 at 4:22 PM
@madscienced great 😃@barbyka actually, the 15 newest trades would still exist. What I'm suggesting is to have all lots made available to see in a list, so, the 15 newest would still be there. I just don't like how we can ONLY see the 15 newest. And this is actually a good idea. Although I don't think it would be entirely possible only by "writing" 'Tific' in the Lot Description.Example: I want a Tific. Then I write on Lot Description the name "Tific", and some kind of "software" locates the word and show this result to someone who has a Tific uft. But what if the person writes "Tifick"? Or "Tiffic"? I think it would only work if we could be able to "mark" in a section which creatures we are seeking. Then there would be no mistakes...Do you understand what I mean? >.< I can also try to use an example with prints from a pokemon game I used to play... It is called "Quick Trade". The person makes a lot and marks what criteria of offers he wants. Then only those who have specifically what they are looking for can offer. (Also, the trade is done automactically. Both users receive each other's pokemons). I told this a few months ago, not sure if it was to you...EDIT: https://uploaddeimagens.com.br/images/000/514/963/full/Quick_Trade_1.png?1443559924https://uploaddeimagens.com.br/images/000/514/964/full/Quick_Trade_2.png?1443559968https://uploaddeimagens.com.br/images/000/514/965/full/Quick_Trade_3.png?1443559980https://uploaddeimagens.com.br/images/000/514/971/full/Quick_Trade_4.png?1443560063https://uploaddeimagens.com.br/images/000/514/970/full/Quick_Trade_5.png?1443560062As I said, once someone have a pokemon that has those conditions (Umbreon with 1mil experience), he will offer, and I don't need to accept. The Umbreon comes automactically to me and the Yveltal goes to him 😊
barbyka • 30 September 2015 at 1:20 AM
@raitonchidori I like that. It's nice for when you really know what you're looking for. I don't know much about programming so I don't know how difficult it would be to add this, with all our creatures and constantly adding more.Hope it gets done in some form, cuz it would make trading a bit easier and we wouldn't get notification from mods, that we shouldn't re post the lots.
Deleted • 30 September 2015 at 5:33 AM
it would be much nicer if the trades were just all there and you could just browse through them but its kinda wasting time because if you think of all the players on egg cave...
destinyrose • 30 September 2015 at 11:48 AM
I really hope they go threw woth this it'd be a huge improvement
raitonchidori • 30 September 2015 at 12:18 PM
@barbyka, @emilia and @destinyrose I'm really happy more people com here to show their support. Hope some mod comes here soon.
bun • 17 October 2015 at 9:58 PM
100% support. o3o
raitonchidori • 19 October 2015 at 7:23 PM
@_black3333_ thank you. It's good to see how many people support it. I feel bad going to trade center, I don't like creating lots (and recreating them, yes I do that). We need a list with all lots, so then we can search trades that interest us >.<
firedawn • 5 November 2015 at 7:11 AM
@raitonchidori Yes, This is a great idea. I have experienced placing a few creature UFT, and then about 10 TNT lots come around, so I had no choice but to cancel that lot and create a new oneI fully support this idea.
raitonchidori • 5 November 2015 at 7:43 AM
@firedawn thanks. I know it's against the rules to keep recreating lots, but with this trade center we have to do that. The mods keep saying the better way to make trades is creating topics in forums, but a lot of people I know don't have time to see forums, such as I don't. I created a topic recently and nobody posted anything.Orderedchaos also told me that Ian knows about this idea, and it will maybe eventually come with a future update. I just hope it happens soon.