Suggestion: Max amount of lots you can open.

in Site Feedback & Ideas

Deleted • 2 March 2016 at 12:00 PM

Seriously, Im tired of users spamming the TC.

Its one thing to put 10+ lots, transfer those and be done with it. Its another to make lots that are each one Creature/item big and repeat that 15 times.

There should be a limit as to how many lots you can have open at a time. Somewhere between 5-10, Id say.


To those who wouldnt like this idea because of transferring: You can transfer in mere minutes by using two browsers/tabs (chrome 'normal' and 'incognito modus') rather than keep switching between accounts.

All opinions are welcome 😊

Female
9,303 posts

     

immortalraven • 2 March 2016 at 12:06 PM

@poof
I think a limit to how many you can make in a day rather than in all. So like max 5 times a day unless for transferring. Be a button to say for transferring and the lot will go down if they aren't moved right away. And a button for actual trades. Be a rule not to abuse the transferring and put UFTs as transfer or get banned from the TC for a day or two or something.
I know a little more complicated but I keep lots in the TC for quite awhile and only put up like 1-3 new ones at a time and keep em in until I need to res something for a trade or it's been 3o days and was kicked out itself >.>

But yes I hate when people flood the TC with all their lots and mine go down and I'm like I JUST put that up >.< -.-

Deleted • 2 March 2016 at 12:22 PM

@immortalraven Mhhm, I have to agree.

Maybe it would be possible to trigger a reaction if you make too many lots in a short time, like lots being closed automatically or bumped down below the 15 newest?

There should be a way to avoid TC spamming, at least o;

Female
9,303 posts

     

immortalraven • 2 March 2016 at 12:26 PM

@poof
Yeah, hopefully something can be figured out and soon ;-;
It's gotten worse recently

Female
409 posts

     

savannahall • 26 March 2016 at 9:42 AM

This would be a good idea, Although now I feel slightly guilty because I recently moved over 100 Tammicks to my bird side. 😋

Even though I moved them pretty quick & did 5 in one lot until I had no more to move, still. xD

I'm in support for @immortalraven idea on it, it sounds more complicated but at the same time is a better option. 😊

Female
2,210 posts

     

barbyka • 26 March 2016 at 12:06 PM

@poof
@immortalraven

It could also help if there was a button for transfer and if you checked it, then your lot wouldn't show in the 15 newest.

Or an option of a private trade that wouldn't show on the list.

Deleted • 26 March 2016 at 12:11 PM

@savannahall Ah, there's a difference between moving them quickly and making lots wait forever o;

Example: Making a lot with Creatures that are all level ~500, with as description 'TNT when immortal'. Then doing that with 10 lots after each other. ...No please. x)

@barbyka I support the idea of a private trade; it would be perfect for transferring Creatures.

Female
409 posts

     

savannahall • 26 March 2016 at 12:15 PM

@poof - very true, I only move mine after they're immortal. 😊

I honestly think an even better option could be a thing were you can link your accounts, and then go onto a page where you can just send pet's over to the selected account instantly! But you couldn't send them to anyone else, Only your sides that you could link with your main or something, If that makes sense. 😊

Female
2,210 posts

     

barbyka • 26 March 2016 at 12:16 PM

@poof

I really hope this gets done, cuz I'll have a blast in a couple of months when I'll have to move around 300 creatures XD

Female
9,303 posts

     

immortalraven • 26 March 2016 at 2:32 PM

@barbyka
I like that one x3


@poof
Yup the TNT when immortal annoy me too. Makes me feel they only do that to gain views in the TC >.>

Male
666 posts

     

veritaspunk • 30 March 2016 at 11:44 PM

@poof I don't do much of creature transferring at all, I never felt any annoyance with any of the sections where we can set up lots.

I don't know how technically feasible this is, but the offenders/spammers should be the one's restricted, you know like the block feature we each get to set for ourselves individually. The one's using it "reasonably" & without dubious aims should not get punished.

Female
162 posts

     

qerrat • 26 May 2016 at 12:25 AM

Totally agree!

Reply