Creature's Happiness

linpug • 27 September 2011 at 12:16 AM

I think that if a creature is immortal, it should be at 100% happiness at all time if they are immortal. I also this you can't be able to book them at Tims, because I accidentally book them and waste EC.

nkiay • 27 September 2011 at 12:18 AM

Support! I just feed them anyway cause I want them to be happy, they should be happy immortals not sad ones. 😸

linpug • 27 September 2011 at 12:19 AM

Yep. The reason they are immortal, because they are mature enough to gather food, correct? I wonder why this makes them sad. D:
@nkiay
@jane
@cafe
@pipkitten

bunnyshadow • 27 September 2011 at 12:20 AM

@linpug maybe they should not get below 50% happyness. That way feeding the creature so still have a point 😊

cubexline • 27 September 2011 at 12:22 AM

@linpug: I think I suggested something like this before and I dont think its going to happen... ☹️

linpug • 27 September 2011 at 12:22 AM

@bunnyshadow You are still able to feed a creature even if it is 100%, correct? A good enough reason is to get EC.

bunnyshadow • 27 September 2011 at 12:24 AM

@linpug, but still...

linpug • 27 September 2011 at 12:25 AM

@bunnyshadow Wouldn't it be better if your creatures were fully happy? It would be much better then just 50%.

pipkitten • 27 September 2011 at 12:27 AM

Personally, it doesn't bother me that immortals get unhappy. As long as they aren't able to die, I'm good~ I usually only keep the ones on my main in Tim's (when I can afford it) just so my entire cove looks cheery. 😋 The immortals in my storage are another story, though. They've got to be the gloomiest things ever. 😈

linpug • 27 September 2011 at 12:30 AM

It also makes you worry if they might die, even if they are immortal.

icymuffin • 27 September 2011 at 12:33 AM

I remember reading somewhere that if a user had all immortal creatures, then you'd have a hard time telling if they actually really cared for their creatures or not. That's why not having 100% happiness for immortals was usefull.

linpug • 27 September 2011 at 12:39 AM

Bump

cafe • 27 September 2011 at 12:39 AM

I think it's fair that the creatures lose happiness.

I mean, they don't die.
It's only fair to have an incentive to put them up with Tims.

But that's just my opinion

linpug • 1 October 2011 at 5:48 PM

Bump

taffy789 • 1 October 2011 at 5:52 PM

@pipkitten - Same here, but i'm sure my Lulvei is still in a happy mood. ^^

Lucen - "No, you NEVER vist anymore"
Meh - *Pushes out Lucen out of this forum post* "Get outta here!"

linpug • 1 October 2011 at 5:54 PM

I really feel bad for Arsha, when I don't have EC, so I have to leave her out. So then I click fifty more pets, you make sure her happiness is 100% XD!

Deleted • 1 October 2011 at 5:56 PM

I'm with @crooton1

I don't think it's so important for immortals to be happy. I always assumed the happiness indicator was just a way of showing newbies if they don't put enough effort in their eggs are going to die.

Once you've put in the effort of making a creature immortal, I think the happiness indicator is rendered obsolete. Just my opinion.

linpug • 1 October 2011 at 5:57 PM

@qwerty732797 I agree ^^

lyricgeek • 1 October 2011 at 8:57 PM

Support 😃

linpug • 2 October 2011 at 10:21 AM

Bump