Being able to take travels off and put back in inventory

stellie • 9 September 2012 at 8:49 PM

Well, What if we decided to take the travel off... lets say... of Num-Nums, Her travel would be removed and directly put back into your inventory! This would be much helpful to users! I think its practical enough, you? This will also save us EC. I mean there isnt a place where the EC spent gets transferred too, right? So this wouldnt hurt EC in any way at all! Your asking: What would be the point in rarity? Since less people are buying travels. Well in that case, maybe there should be a limit on how many travels that can be put back in inventory, like 10 a month

@Ian
@Meteoroid
@orderedchaos
@annapashmina
@byfelisa

alex_ • 9 September 2012 at 8:50 PM

@stellie I agree with this! 😃

stellie • 9 September 2012 at 8:51 PM

@alex_

YES! If this happens, Ill be able to have more SoBs!

alex_ • 9 September 2012 at 8:52 PM

@stellie

XD Yeah

Deleted • 9 September 2012 at 8:54 PM

@stellie then we wouldn't be spending EC over and over again for the same travel!! i love this idea!!

stellie • 9 September 2012 at 8:57 PM

@izzfred

Exactly, I mean there isnt a place where the EC spent gets transferred too, right? So this wouldnt hurt EC in any way at all!

ladybugheart • 9 September 2012 at 9:00 PM

I like this idea. 😊 Although there's probably some reason it hasn't been implemented yet. Perhaps it's designed to reflect real traveling; when you return, you don't get another ticket to go back. Or, maybe it will make travels drop in value, since some are now viewed as trading items. *shrugs*

xstephaanie • 9 September 2012 at 9:02 PM

I like this idea 😊

icymuffin • 9 September 2012 at 9:05 PM

Well, we still need something other than Tim's to spend our EC on.
To remove EC from Egg Cave and such...

karenna19 • 10 September 2012 at 12:55 AM

You have my vote 😊

Deleted • 10 September 2012 at 1:33 AM

think of it this way - when you go on holiday, the money is spent, the time goes by and you're back home. you cant get that holiday again until you pay again.

you're idea cant work because you cant get that travel back unless you pay for it again.

poppiloveslabs • 10 September 2012 at 4:21 AM

You have my vote

nousernamesleft • 10 September 2012 at 4:38 AM

@stellie
I love the idea. But I guess travels will become less rare as they would stay in circulation.

plushie • 10 September 2012 at 6:48 AM

Agreed! (:

whispers • 10 September 2012 at 6:53 AM

@stellie
I don't agree. As phalen said earlier, when you come home from vacation, you don't get another ticket for free. You have to buy another one. It is kind of the same here, but there are images.

stellie • 10 September 2012 at 7:01 AM

@whispers
@phalen

But Egg Cave travels sort of act like backgrounds, not like REAL travels, the concept behind it is, but mostly, it sort of is like a decorative background

Deleted • 10 September 2012 at 7:02 AM

@stellie

then what will the point of rarity be?

stellie • 10 September 2012 at 7:09 AM

@phalen

Well in that case, maybe there should be a limit on how many travels that can be put back in inventory, like 10 a month

whispers • 10 September 2012 at 4:39 PM

@stellie
No matter what, I still do not agree with this.

fakeworld • 10 September 2012 at 4:54 PM

@stellie I agree, re-buying it is a waste of money after you already purchased it. Kind of annoying.

rileytibbles_side • 10 September 2012 at 4:55 PM

@stellie
Maybe we should lower the limit to 5 a month, other than that I like this idea. Also, there should be a travel trading center, that would be exciting as well😊

cherryish • 10 September 2012 at 4:58 PM

@stellie I agree! That would be helpful. @rileytibbles_side That would be awesome!

Orderedchaos • 10 September 2012 at 5:02 PM

I always thought of travels as the creature actually taking a trip. Once you go on a trip and come back, can you reuse your plane ticket to go on that trip again? Nope, its gone forever. I view travels like that, tickets for your creature to go to a certain destination. For that reason I don't really like the idea of travels being reusable.

stellie • 10 September 2012 at 5:22 PM

@orderedchaos
@whispers

Yes, you guys to have good points, If there was a point of being able to reuse them they would be called Backgrounds instead of travels, maybe there can be a different idea to obtain retired travels, that was the whole reason I created this suggestion

pebblestar-nightclan • 10 September 2012 at 6:16 PM

Agree with @phalen, @whispers, and @orderedchaos. ^^ Yes, travels serve as backgrounds, but they technically are vacations for creatures. ^.^

jennifer • 10 September 2012 at 6:26 PM

@stellie @rileytibbles_side
I agree. If not, lower the limit to 5 a month.

lunacharm1037 • 10 September 2012 at 6:32 PM

sometimes i want to change the background but I don't because I will then lose the one I have