Register
stellie • 18 August 2011 at 4:51 PM
I really think that if a user quits or gets banned, all of their eggs should get put in the adoption cantre instead of dying (IDK if this already happens) but please PING if this a good idea
syndrome • 18 August 2011 at 4:52 PM
@stellie THey should if they get banned, but the user should decide who gets them if they quit
dreamer • 18 August 2011 at 4:52 PM
@STellie *pushes huge support button*I used to have a Colatay named Keshi, but I traded her and the user who had her got banned and she died there, and apparently she can't be revived. :/ I miss her. D':
stellie • 18 August 2011 at 4:54 PM
Some people quit unexpectedly without giving there creatures away, >Thats not right
whitefall • 18 August 2011 at 4:55 PM
No. Many people would abuse this to get everyone's Onnies & etc. 😋They can keep their eggs if they wqant. It's their choice. If they want to leave their eggs in the AC, they would.
icymuffin • 18 August 2011 at 4:58 PM
But if they're banned, they basically just get their account deleted & all the creatures that they own...
happy • 18 August 2011 at 4:59 PM
@stellie many people don't want to give away their loved ones they raised from the beginning and some people are snobs =.=
jazzyleia • 18 August 2011 at 5:03 PM
@stellie I Agree! Those who quit though should pick the new owners and all the junk eggs they have left are put into the AC...it would be better for them
stellie • 18 August 2011 at 5:06 PM
it would be nice if they did do something like this, i knew someone who quit unexpectedly and never came back on again, therefore all there creatures died ☹️ @ian
icymuffin • 18 August 2011 at 5:14 PM
Though... if I took a really really long hiatus and came back to find that my creatures ripped out of my cove, I think I would have a really bad hissi fit.But don't you think that the lv2000 immortality thingy also would prevent some creatures from dying in the first place?
Orderedchaos • 18 August 2011 at 5:21 PM
I agree with Icymuffin. You can never know if someone quit unexpectedly or is taking a break because life has gotten to busy for them to check Egg Cave for a while. I've disappeared for a month before because I was dealing with real life issues. If I had come back to find that all my creatures were gone because I "quit unexpectedly" there would be h*** to pay.I can almost see this working for banning, but creatures being deleted because the user was banned is part of the punishment. Don't want your creatures deleted? Don't get banned.While this is a nice idea, but there are some things with it that need to be worked out to make it practical.
happy • 18 August 2011 at 5:22 PM
@stellie well, people still go on their accounts even if they quit. and i wouldn't like it if some random person that i dont know has my eggs 😋
cafe • 18 August 2011 at 5:26 PM
How about, if the critter reaches zero and is supposed to die - it just goes to the AC; Kinda like recycling.
icymuffin • 18 August 2011 at 5:29 PM
It only takes a minimum of about 4 days for a creature to reach 0 happiness. And if you're trying to save EC, especially with lv2000 creatures, it's not that hard to accidentally lose creatures...
cafe • 18 August 2011 at 5:31 PM
But they still disappear anyway.I mean, instead of them dying and being gone forever they get a chance to go to someone elseOH OH OHIan opens a shop of rare creatures that are supposed to be dead. And, a person enters once a dayKinda like a raffle; that way everyone has a shot at it - and it's fair
lilrainbowdraggy • 18 August 2011 at 6:24 PM
Mabye the reson people don't give their creatuers to the adoption thingy when they quit is partly becasue you have to pay to put a creatuer up for adoption?
cubexline • 18 August 2011 at 6:30 PM
I support for when they get banned, but when a user quits no.
cafe • 18 August 2011 at 6:36 PM
@lkjhgfdsa27That's spam
Deleted • 18 August 2011 at 6:43 PM
@stellie i agree!! , i dont think if someone quits they should go there unless they havent been on in 2 months+ but if they get banned yea i agree they shoudl go to the AC, i agree 😊 @cafe yea i agree too, ian should open a shop like that 😊
miomar • 27 August 2011 at 6:29 AM
I only think this is good for banned people...
Deleted • 27 August 2011 at 6:41 AM
@MiomarSame here, or atleast when their account is deleted.
miomar • 27 August 2011 at 6:41 AM
@Uni Yeah...
Deleted • 27 August 2011 at 6:44 AM
If someone hasn't logged on once for say, a YEAR, and their cove is still full of imortals.... Don't you think it would be good if they went into the adoption center, and the account deleted?
miomar • 27 August 2011 at 6:50 AM
@Lexa No because the creatures are still from that person...
Deleted • 27 August 2011 at 6:55 AM
@miomar So if smilies quit without giving away her pets, and you were staring at her onnys and tines IN TEN YEARS, thinking, she hasn't logged on in ten years....! Why does she deserve them, I'll never get any, and she has five and doesn't even appreciate them.....
miomar • 27 August 2011 at 6:57 AM
Okay but 10 years ir really long X^D!
cafe • 27 August 2011 at 6:58 AM
I still say if an egg is to die from not being fed, and they're going to disappear anyways, they just go to a raffle that eveyone can have a shot at.But that's my opinion
Deleted • 27 August 2011 at 6:59 AM
@cafe but lvl2000s?
miomar • 27 August 2011 at 7:05 AM
@Cafe Yeah, how about lv2000?
evolutary • 27 August 2011 at 7:20 AM
Maybe for those who get banned, but not when they quit. (This has been said 10 times already, but whatever xD).