A More Efficient Tim's

lykhaos117 • 17 April 2015 at 6:06 PM

I was thinking that it would be more efficient to have a "Select All Below x Happiness" option on Tim's in which you can automatically select all creatures below a certain happiness level. Some users have creatures at varying happiness levels, and it's time consuming if you don't want to put them all in Tim's to scroll through and check all the ones that have low happiness, especially since the page might reload when you're glancing at your cove in another tab. What do you think?

Livepulse Pings (sorry!):
@bang14982
@iceiceice
@mlpnko159
@fakeworld
@iloveu2

mlpnko159 • 17 April 2015 at 7:21 PM

@lykhaos117

Haha, I don't mind pings at all. I really like this idea, I have a lot of mortal creatures that vary in happiness levels, so this would be so useful, but that's just me😊

lykhaos117 • 17 April 2015 at 7:32 PM

@mlpnko159

Thank you for responding! I'm glad that this would be useful to you, too. 😃

More Livepulse Pings:
@fiamma
@ljacks
@hendriks

bang14982 • 17 April 2015 at 8:24 PM

@lykhaos117

I think this is a good idea! I'm sure lots of users out there could sure use this feature. 😊

cclynn2855 • 17 April 2015 at 8:25 PM

@lykhaos117
Absolutely yes!!!

bun • 20 April 2015 at 3:23 PM

@lykhaos117
I'd prefer a "Select all mortal creatures" since all my immortals are already at 0 happiness, so I would just select all of those as well. P:

wolffey • 20 May 2015 at 3:38 PM

@lykhaos117 This would be very useful, well for me at least 😊

thaliel • 26 May 2015 at 10:33 AM

The one thing that really needs work that, even when you choose to hide immortals, they weill still be selected with the select all function.

hayleysmith • 9 June 2015 at 12:47 PM

I like this idea, maybe there could also be a 'de-select immortals' button too?

savannahall • 11 June 2015 at 8:22 AM

@lykhaos117 - I think this would be a VERY good idea! I can't tell you how many times i've needed that. 😃

cclynn2855 • 11 June 2015 at 10:13 AM

@lykhaos117 very good idea.... I also think it would be good to have a "remove immortals" button otherwise you have to scroll through allll the creatures to do it your self

thedarkstar • 11 June 2015 at 9:42 PM

Support

sorrow • 13 June 2015 at 12:53 AM

Support

sunfire103 • 13 June 2015 at 10:54 AM

Support - some I feed a daily basis so they don't need to be put into Tim's as much. As far as the hide all immortals, it should also make them not be able to selected after you choose the option.

lykhaos117 • 16 July 2015 at 10:24 AM

@bang14982
@cclynn2855
@_black3333_
@wolffey
@thaliel
@alltheotherawesomepeopleicantping

Thank you everyone for your support! ❤️

mishababy • 20 July 2015 at 1:40 AM

Oh wow, would this be handy! I truly hope this gets accepted, and I'm a bit surprised it wasn't suggested sooner. Thank you for posting this. ❤️

howrsetoo • 24 July 2015 at 12:16 PM

@lykhaos117
I think it's a great idea!!! Very nice. 😃

yileen • 24 July 2015 at 1:17 PM

I see why this will be very handy, although I always have all mortals in tims 😊

BUT i might not always have the ec for that 😊 so yes I like the idea a lot

thesplashingmagikarp • 24 July 2015 at 1:33 PM

I definitely support this idea, as well as the suggestion for 'remove immortals' option.

kota • 8 April 2016 at 9:28 AM

Great idea! Full support here.

savannahall • 8 April 2016 at 6:02 PM

@lykhaos117 - Total support! It happens to me all the time! 😊

I think another cool option would be to have it like the easy codes do, Where you can click a button that only gives you links to mortal pet's, even if an immortal pet is checked. I think it'd be cool to be able to click a button that only puts mortal pet's in tims, even if immortal pet's are checked too! 😊

miandasuxx • 9 April 2016 at 6:18 PM

Thats a Really great idea!

christened_moon • 10 April 2016 at 11:06 AM

Hmmm, I agree with @hayleysmith and @cclynn2855 with removing immortals, since I really have no reason to put them in Tim's, but I'm not sure that I need a button based on happiness...I put my creatures in based on whether they're mortal/immortal, not happiness.

bunnyshadow • 10 April 2016 at 2:43 PM

Support.

bgunny • 13 April 2016 at 6:55 PM

This is an awesome idea.

fairy_tail • 14 April 2016 at 3:55 AM

I think it would be better if it were a "Select all Mortals" button instead because creatures might have varying levels of happiness.

But I support the idea of making Tim's more efficient.

tyerwa • 18 April 2016 at 6:07 PM

This would be helpful for many, seeing as they might only feed so many each day compared to the rest of their creatures.