Search Forums

Deleted • 30 July 2015 at 3:41 AM

I'd like to point out something else, too.

I totally agree with what @maleficent said before.
Nobody forced people to pay so much for the creature they bought. They decided on their free will to spend money on it. They can't complain or blame the others who decided to make different...

netherling • 30 July 2015 at 3:39 AM

@dragonnn
And maybe they can get a unique bonus and a few other things too. Something you can only have from an original, you cant buy it either

dragonnn • 30 July 2015 at 2:47 AM

But for those against the possibility of creatures being re-realeased, who do happen to care about the value of original release dates versus later 'copies', maybe the original/older creatures could gain some sort of special status like the Star creatures, only, this status cannot be purchased from...

kschr26 • 30 July 2015 at 12:55 AM

Hello, everyone who may or may not be reading this!😸

I have seen so many for and against arguments, my mind is spinning! I have to say that after reading all these opinions and reasons, i have to say that i would most likely be on the fence about this subject.

I mean, if in moderation and control...

okami • 30 July 2015 at 12:54 AM

@yam

I edited my previous post. I'll just copy that part here:
I feel like other options should at least be tried first, because rereleasing stuff doesn't seem like the answer to me. If nothing else works and rereleasing creatures is a serious option, then it should at least be cave ones only. Tha...

netherling • 30 July 2015 at 12:41 AM

Things are going to go with the majority, which will keep most people happy. I still support the re-release but I know in the morning there will be more debating. I'm taking a break. Peace.

yam • 30 July 2015 at 12:39 AM

@bluewolf

I understand the sticking to their word point.

As for not discrediting people's hard work, what if it happened in a way that only ever so slightly trickled creatures into the system? I mean, it's true in every system, whether game or real life, that the market moves up and down rather t...

okami • 30 July 2015 at 12:36 AM

@yam

For me it isn't about values and rarity. I honestly couldn't care less about that, because values are all in the eyes of each individual user. And I am very much aware that some retired creatures seem to be very hard to ever obtain. It's just that if they decided to rerelease creatures from t...

despair • 30 July 2015 at 12:15 AM

@ami_utsukushii

Ok, so their opinions changed. That's all fine all dandy but their word didn't change.

But listen yall I'm getting sleepy so I'm going to hit the hay.

Tl;dr anything I said: Eggcave shouldn't re-release stuff for various reasons.

Have a good day everyone.

yam • 30 July 2015 at 12:14 AM

Ok. Well, i think i've injected my two cents in here and hopefully it gets considered. This thread is really clogging up the livepulse tbh 😋 (just playing)

Just to summarize my view:

It seems that most people who are against it are because of eggcave's policy in the past (and not so much because...

netherling • 30 July 2015 at 12:12 AM

@despair
Sometimes things happen. People's opinions change and if they feel like a re-release should be discussed then they must have a reason.

despair • 30 July 2015 at 12:09 AM

@yam

I say that they should stick to what they have said, point blank. Saying "Oh, and we're changing what we said in the past" is just as bad as lying, imo. Now, if they said future creatures might be subject to re-releases, that's a different story.

Still disagree with it a bit, but...

netherling • 30 July 2015 at 12:08 AM

Whatever happens happens. A re-release is a very big possibility, and when/if it happens it'll be worked with. And everyone will get used to it eventually whether they like it or not. Just being real.

yam • 30 July 2015 at 12:05 AM

@despair

I see. So say, hypothetically, eggcave made a public statement that they were thinking about rereleases in the future and that all creatures would be culpable and blah blah, for that once they would be going back on their word but it's also a public policy change: would you (and others who...

despair • 30 July 2015 at 12:02 AM

@yam

A mixture of both, tbh. Re-releases aren't the answer. They said they wouldn't so instead they need to find a different way of doing things and from now on make it to where the slogans of creatures don't stress up and down nine ways to Sunday that it's your last chance to get them. Forever i...

yam • 29 July 2015 at 11:59 PM

@despair
@bluewolf

I have a question for you guys. Is it that you don't see a problem with how the site currently is, about older creatures having no outlet into the "Egg cave economy" and thus being not a part of the game anymore, or is it that you understand there's a problem but think...

veritaspunk • 29 July 2015 at 11:58 PM

@despair

of course, because it's either to re-release or don't ... "first choice" .. it's an either / or

What some are jumping to is either a full re-release or just cave creatures

despair • 29 July 2015 at 11:53 PM

@bluewolf

My point exactly. 😸 Jumping on the re-release boat seems to be everyone's first choice, haha.

syndrome • 29 July 2015 at 11:36 PM

No chill, no chill.

dawnfur • 29 July 2015 at 11:32 PM

@iceiceice

I liked the idea of event/quest

I've always been a fan of the valentine event, feed so much to get points and maybe a prize could be like a drem? Maybe there could be a limit..?

But that's just me. I'm not very creative. ._.

okami • 29 July 2015 at 11:31 PM

I can't believe this discussion is still going at the rate it is xD I'm not going to actively join in at the moment though, as I'm sick from good ol' dehydration and feel terrible. All I'll say is that this site gave their word about past creatures being retired forever. And as for people who want t...

iceiceice • 29 July 2015 at 11:29 PM

Alrighty, all we've been talking about is how we're for or against rereleases, but not a possible resolution. If we continue bickering, I think we'll just end up repeating ourselves.

So, if we were to rerelease, how are we going to do it?

People seem to be jumping onto nyms, macbots, or whatever...

despair • 29 July 2015 at 11:29 PM

Super rare...i'd say not. I know the value will go up again eventually, but then it'll go right back down.

I strongly prefer @bluewolf's idea of exclusive limited creatures.

netherling • 29 July 2015 at 11:26 PM

@despair
Its not like the site will go into disrepair. Eventually its going to get to the point where they're super rare again. Because of people who quit, hiatus and end up never coming back. And then other things.

despair • 29 July 2015 at 11:23 PM

Better never than late, I'd say. Without exclusiveness the game lacks challenge snd thrill imo

rosaline_kaye • 29 July 2015 at 11:20 PM

@plague

preach

ok back to sleeping now

netherling • 29 July 2015 at 11:20 PM

Better late than never xD I'd we waited longer like you said then that's even later than 6 years @depair

despair • 29 July 2015 at 11:15 PM

You also have to take into account that Eggcave said they wouldn't do it anymore. xD Like I said, seems a bit odd 6 years in.

Even if you want things to change for the "better", I feel this is still a pretty sound argument to stand behind.

netherling • 29 July 2015 at 11:13 PM

I'm just staying on the supporting side or re-releases. Back then is a whole heck of a lot different than now. You have to take that into account too.

syndrome • 29 July 2015 at 11:09 PM

*munches popcorn*

This is really great you guys, I love reading the arguments back and forth because I don't really care either way. I'm mainly here for the community and such. However it has come to my attention that most of the users gunning for a no are users who have creatures of high value a...