Sending Creatures

in Site Feedback & Ideas

good idea, bad idea?




Female
1,630 posts

     

sorrow • 1 May 2016 at 1:51 PM

It would be like sending items! 😸 It would help people so they could just send the creatures instead of logging out then trading and logging back in, it would save time 😸


Edit: Thanks everyone who pointed this out! There should be a accept/decline policy so people don't get spammed with creatures, kinda like the friend requests, where you can accept all, decline all, or do it one by one.

Female
66 posts

     

puggirl • 1 May 2016 at 3:56 PM

i think that is a good idea

Female
496 posts

     

shadow_girl • 1 May 2016 at 6:16 PM

same! 😊

1,075 posts

     

possiegal • 1 May 2016 at 6:17 PM

@teddy267 well when people send creatures to someone the person may or may not want the creatures.
if they dont, they will have to get rid of the creatures,
one way would be to send them to another person and soon we would have lots of creatures just floating from person to person.

get what i mean?

but if you could get the persons permission first and then send them it would be better, so like if you send a creature to someone but it doesn't end up in their cove until they accept it. If they dont want it they can just decline and it will return to the original person.

Trans Man
151 posts

     

ancientclaw • 1 May 2016 at 6:30 PM

@possiegal
@teddy267

I agree. Its a good idea but would be better if there was a decline/accept sequence to follow!

Female
215 posts

     

stefrawr • 2 May 2016 at 10:34 AM

this is a good idea!!! also the accept/decline option would help also. 😊

Female
27 posts

     

dolphin20o • 2 May 2016 at 8:52 PM

Definitely should have decline and accept option. But yes, it's a good idea

Female
19 posts

     

opalspirit- • 2 May 2016 at 10:13 PM

Good idea, but there should definitely be a decline or accept option; or then imagine how crazy it would be on here. O_o

Female
1,630 posts

     

sorrow • 2 May 2016 at 10:38 PM

@possiegal @ancientclaw And everyone else

I feel the decline/accept vibe. I'll edit it into the first post πŸ˜‹

Female
16,231 posts

     

bunnyshadow • 3 May 2016 at 2:13 AM

@teddy267 Sounds like a great idea, I support it ^&^

Female
1,630 posts

     

sorrow • 3 May 2016 at 2:35 AM

@bunnyshadow
Thanks!

Deleted • 3 May 2016 at 6:21 PM

@teddy267
Yeah, with accepting/declining, I'd like that. Transferring might become easier, and we'd get less TC spam.

Female
1,924 posts

     

reality • 3 May 2016 at 7:55 PM

Seems like a good idea😊

Female
1,630 posts

     

sorrow • 3 May 2016 at 8:02 PM

@panda9983
Thanks! That's good to hear!

@kas
I never thought about the TC spam! Thats a good point. My main idea was to make transferring creature a little more easy so that you wouldn't have to wait get more immortal creatures to send over to a side account ina trade.

Female
4 posts

     

howler55016 • 9 May 2016 at 2:50 AM

Maybe there should be a limit on how may creatures you can send in like 4 or 5 hours? So that no one can spam each other with requests either kind of

Female
1,630 posts

     

sorrow • 9 May 2016 at 7:44 PM

@howler55016

In my first post, I added a decline or accept concept, so that way if they get annoyed they can start declining. My main idea idea was so you could get creatures to a side accout quickly, so I don't think a time spacing would be efficient, but maybe an option to block people from sending you creatures to you/requests so they would stop spamming you, and have a list that you can see to add or take off different people 😸

Female
2,315 posts

     

prairie • 25 May 2016 at 4:15 PM

@teddy267

I find it safer to do the trading insted of sending, as you can accidentally send items (thus the creatures) to wrong users.
Granted, you can do this in trades too, but its less likely. :/

It might make things easier if there was a transfer station in which you can transfer creatures directly from one account to another without setting up a trade, but that would have one HUGE flaw, which would be that if someone hacked 1 account, theyd have access to all. πŸ˜‹

Female
1,630 posts

     

sorrow • 25 May 2016 at 10:29 PM

@prairie

Ah, I see! Thanks for your feedback!

Female
162 posts

     

qerrat • 26 May 2016 at 12:15 AM

I SO AGREE WITH YOU, @teddy267! I've made a Forum on the EXACT SAME THING! I SO AGREE WITH U ON THIS!

Female
1,630 posts

     

sorrow • 26 May 2016 at 12:23 AM

@qerrat

Well thank you! I'm glad you agree! Thanks for the feedback 😸

Non-binary
3,331 posts

     

carter • 26 May 2016 at 5:01 PM

@teddy267
I seriously hope this happens one day. We've needed it for a long, long time.

Female
1,630 posts

     

sorrow • 26 May 2016 at 7:44 PM

@carter

❀️ Thanks for the feedback, and I'm glad you agree 😸

34 posts

     

fs65 • 2 June 2016 at 1:33 PM

@teddy267 I just made a topic on this idea!!! The accept/decline would be necessary though. I wonder if eggcaveteam would do it?

Deleted • 6 June 2016 at 11:41 AM

@teddy267

Yeah I think this would be a good idea, as I firstly hate trying to send creatures to my side account, and secondly I would like it if you could just trade creatures for EC, without having to give at least one egg in return. Good idea! 😊

Female
320 posts

     

christened_moon • 6 June 2016 at 12:15 PM

I've been waiting so long for this! I keep transferring Pyraguins, but it really stinks having to log in and out so much.

Female
1,630 posts

     

sorrow • 6 June 2016 at 6:42 PM

@fs65 @christened_moon @jrw48
Thanks for your feedback, I'm glad you like it 😸

Reply