Register
We found 939 total matches. Looking for the users and creatures search? (This is forum posts only.)
netherling • 1 August 2015 at 9:07 PM
@jrtalon I honestly do think the purging thing is a good idea depending on how it's carried out. If the y do end up doing that I wonder how they'll do it.
poptarts • 1 August 2015 at 4:56 PM
@metaphor @ian @leonxI agree holding a retired creature raffle would be a beneficial idea, that way the raffle can distribute a certain amount of retired creatures that way the creature is obtainable but their values wont be lowered a tremendous amount. The raffles can cost a certain amount of ec...
despair • 1 August 2015 at 3:43 PM
@jrtalon Agreed.
jrtalon • 1 August 2015 at 3:42 PM
@dragonnn brings up a good point regarding side accounts & my suggestion that eggs in an account get recirculated if the user doesn't sign-in after a year or two. There would definitely have to be a measure to link side accounts to a main account & only the main account would be required t...
Ian • 1 August 2015 at 3:00 PM
My response will be posted within the next couple of days. There's a lot of ground to cover here.Thanks for your continued patience.
kschr26 • 1 August 2015 at 4:32 AM
I agree, it would be interesting to see your input in all these ideas @ian
promise • 31 July 2015 at 1:50 PM
@ianI am eagerly waiting for you to address concerns or give us an update on your thinking.
netherling • 31 July 2015 at 1:19 PM
@aquari Yeah it could be like that.
aquari • 31 July 2015 at 10:26 AM
May be if it was done during a special time for a day or two like Egg Cave b-day or beginning of the year. It could be a different creature each time.
netherling • 31 July 2015 at 2:21 AM
My main problem is the crazy prices. If the prices were lowered then id be happy. I'd be able to get my dreamies without spending a stupid amount of money. If you're gonna trade a creature, do it reasonably. I'm not going to want to give you my paycheck + five of my creatures to get one creature. Be...
despair • 31 July 2015 at 1:04 AM
@fakeworld The idea is a bit off-putting but I certainly agree with it more than this re-release stuff.And yeah, it is a task you have to do. But, I mean, it's not hard all. xD You have 2 years to log in and out. xD
fakeworld • 31 July 2015 at 12:57 AM
@dragonnn @despair I suggested something like this Here. It has examples also. The whole purging idea is kind of horrifying, it'll be like forcing users to perform a task in order to keep the creatures in which they've obtained (by luck, CC, etc) i...
despair • 31 July 2015 at 12:28 AM
@dragonnn This is why some sort of manual account linking feature needs to be added. If your side account was linked to your main account with this new feature whenever you logged onto any of the accounts in the link it would register as you logged into all of them.
dragonnn • 31 July 2015 at 12:20 AM
I say no to the account purging in general.Regardless, side accounts need to be linked to main accounts ( I believe they still aren't). I never log in to my immortal storage account unless I'm transferring immortals over. I have no desire to face a purge penalty because I didn't sign in to my own...
netherling • 30 July 2015 at 11:28 PM
@aquari Some people are trying to find alternatives, I guess that's how it came up. The main points on both sides are:Non-supporters: we spent a good amount of money on creatures and don't want that to be wasted. Supporters: prices for creatures are super high and its harder to get them now bec...
dawnfur • 30 July 2015 at 11:20 PM
@aquari The inactive thing came as a compromise for not rereleasing. 😋
aquari • 30 July 2015 at 11:18 PM
@ami_utsukushii yea I understand and is unfortunate, but they do have what they paid for it cannot be helped -cannot stop or force them - if their an active user I actually just looked at the first page and I don't know how the argument of inactive users poped up. The actual question is should r...
netherling • 30 July 2015 at 11:08 PM
@aquari If there is a small chance, there needs to be like.... A rule to it. It just occurred to me like...what if a user has like...(unrealistically) about seven or eight of an old cash shop creature. If they get another one they shouldn't keep it because like, they already have a lot more than ot...
aquari • 30 July 2015 at 11:03 PM
I think Inactive accounts over 5 years should b purged it gives more than enough time for someone to at least check in. If a purge rule is going to b used everyone must follow it the rule can be updated through the site blog that way everyone knows what is going on. If the beasts are going to b rec...
netherling • 30 July 2015 at 10:51 PM
There are some people who quit who completely forgot about the site or forgot their passwords. Those people wouldn't come back because they can't. I lost access to my other account that way. Forgot the password and lost my last email account. If we did purge other accounts, the ones that need to be...
iceiceice • 30 July 2015 at 10:00 PM
If rereleases aren't implemented (though I prefer it), I would be satisfied if something were to happen to the deleted account's creature. It addresses my problem, so I'm okay.Even though I'm hesitant on the "inactivity" thing (I was inactive for 4 years or so before I came back)....
veritaspunk • 30 July 2015 at 9:59 PM
@despair I really like the pace of the two CC and two Cave with an LE thrown out here and there or event ... 5 CC creatures would be too overwhelming ...for me ...
immortalraven • 30 July 2015 at 9:59 PM
@leonx I think old accounts with no critters should be because it make so much more space. I rarely see users with nothing in their account come back unless it had only been a few months since they left and things died. But ones that have been gone for like a year I usually don't see again unless t...
despair • 30 July 2015 at 9:55 PM
@fakeworld Another idea: Instead of releasing creatures, what about giving newer users a chance to obtain creatures that will become extremely rare on a special day once a year? For example, Egg Cave could release 5 very appealing creatures, that could be available for 24-48 hours for 500CC in th...
moopana • 30 July 2015 at 9:55 PM
An account purge seems like it would be okay FOR ALL FUTURE ACCOUNTS. (or people who are on past the point of implementing) People who have already stopped visiting did so under the assumption that their eggs would be kept. It'd be unfair to get rid of their creatures now. But all future people woul...
elf • 30 July 2015 at 9:54 PM
@immortalraven Yeah, I kinda think old accounts should be deleted as well. Unless Eggcave wants a statistic of the total number of users as a recors or something 😋 But they also serve as nice museums and such x3
fakeworld • 30 July 2015 at 9:50 PM
I don't believe old accounts should be deleted, however, I do believe that accounts that may have been deleted by request or due to any other reason, should in fact have their creatures donated to a special place so that they could be obtained by others and not just thrown away. Another idea: Inst...
immortalraven • 30 July 2015 at 9:48 PM
@leonx I prefer re-releases over account purging. Then I prefer that accounts that are being deleted either just being deleted cause they don't care of this place anymore and is of their request or accounts that are being deleted because they broke rules critters being dispersed. Then the account p...
elf • 30 July 2015 at 9:41 PM
Not too sure about the AC idea. A lot of older inactive users clearly stated that they did not want to give away any of their creatures or names when they quit. It's not their fault that we want their creatures. They spent time and money on their coves, and probably didn't want to just give it away....
maleficent • 30 July 2015 at 9:26 PM
Egg Cave should be an active community. Dead accounts are not productive to gaming sites and why they purge.Since Egg Cave is a gaming site using references about what works and does not work on other sites has merit. Vouchers, Items, Auctions, etc were done on other sites long before being implem...