Search Forums

netherling • 2 August 2015 at 1:35 AM

I wonder how its all gonna work out xD

newlife • 2 August 2015 at 1:18 AM

That does sound EXACTLY what Plague would say omg.

But I think the loyalty program is something we can go over.

Like logging in for a set amount of days, feeding creatures, going to the click exchange, participating in the forums, etc. This would help Eggcave be a bit more lively.

The loyalty sh...

netherling • 2 August 2015 at 12:20 AM

@iceiceice
I like that post xD it made me laugh but also pointed out a lot of good points. Some were meh but others were super right.

veritaspunk • 2 August 2015 at 12:09 AM

@newlife

It's in the post by plague ( #179 )

iceiceice • 2 August 2015 at 12:06 AM

I took that as a jocular remark, but I could be wrong...?
Quoted:
"This is really great you guys, I love reading the arguments back and forth because I don't really care either way. I'm mainly here for the community and such. However it has come to my attention that most of the users gunning f...

newlife • 2 August 2015 at 12:00 AM

@veritaspunk

Could you quote the post? (Or just copy and paste)
I didn't read some of the pages

veritaspunk • 1 August 2015 at 11:38 PM

@poptarts

I liked the loyalty points system mentioned several pages back

netherling • 1 August 2015 at 11:21 PM

@jrtalon
I think that if you already have one of the creatures (like if you have a Macbot) and you see one in the adoption center (if this happens) that you can't get it because you should give someone else a chance to get that one. There should actually be pages of creatures you can scroll through...

newlife • 1 August 2015 at 10:04 PM

@jrtalon
That's actually even more brilliant.. There should be a way to stop people from getting it on their sides too. Maybe 1 creature per deleted account? That only applies if it's LEs/CCs that get dumped, so people can still adopt cave monthlies and commons.

jrtalon • 1 August 2015 at 9:58 PM

@ami_utsukushii @newlife I was just thinking here there would also have to be a measure to prevent one person from harvesting all the good eggs if I cove gets dumped. It would be extremely unfair if a cove with a Macbot, Doovoo, Nym & Clous got dumped and one person came by and got them all. I w...

despair • 1 August 2015 at 9:16 PM

@newlife

Yep. I agree with this idea much more than the idea of just flat out re-releasing stuff. 😋

newlife • 1 August 2015 at 9:15 PM

@jrtalon
Love your idea.
I think it should be after 2 years though. If they don't log in all the creatures get dumped into the adoption center. Same thing with accounts being deleted. Creatures that are in deleted accounts should also be put into the adoption center.
Would help with recirulation

netherling • 1 August 2015 at 9:07 PM

@jrtalon
I honestly do think the purging thing is a good idea depending on how it's carried out. If the y do end up doing that I wonder how they'll do it.

poptarts • 1 August 2015 at 4:56 PM

@metaphor @ian @leonx

I agree holding a retired creature raffle would be a beneficial idea, that way the raffle can distribute a certain amount of retired creatures that way the creature is obtainable but their values wont be lowered a tremendous amount. The raffles can cost a certain amount of ec...

despair • 1 August 2015 at 3:43 PM

@jrtalon

Agreed.

jrtalon • 1 August 2015 at 3:42 PM

@dragonnn brings up a good point regarding side accounts & my suggestion that eggs in an account get recirculated if the user doesn't sign-in after a year or two. There would definitely have to be a measure to link side accounts to a main account & only the main account would be required t...

Ian • 1 August 2015 at 3:00 PM

My response will be posted within the next couple of days. There's a lot of ground to cover here.

Thanks for your continued patience.

kschr26 • 1 August 2015 at 4:32 AM

I agree, it would be interesting to see your input in all these ideas @ian

promise • 31 July 2015 at 1:50 PM

@ian

I am eagerly waiting for you to address concerns or give us an update on your thinking.

netherling • 31 July 2015 at 1:19 PM

@aquari
Yeah it could be like that.

aquari • 31 July 2015 at 10:26 AM

May be if it was done during a special time for a day or two like Egg Cave b-day or beginning of the year. It could be a different creature each time.

netherling • 31 July 2015 at 2:21 AM

My main problem is the crazy prices. If the prices were lowered then id be happy. I'd be able to get my dreamies without spending a stupid amount of money. If you're gonna trade a creature, do it reasonably. I'm not going to want to give you my paycheck + five of my creatures to get one creature. Be...

despair • 31 July 2015 at 1:04 AM

@fakeworld

The idea is a bit off-putting but I certainly agree with it more than this re-release stuff.

And yeah, it is a task you have to do. But, I mean, it's not hard all. xD You have 2 years to log in and out. xD

fakeworld • 31 July 2015 at 12:57 AM

@dragonnn @despair
I suggested something like this Here. It has examples also.

The whole purging idea is kind of horrifying, it'll be like forcing users to perform a task in order to keep the creatures in which they've obtained (by luck, CC, etc) i...

despair • 31 July 2015 at 12:28 AM

@dragonnn

This is why some sort of manual account linking feature needs to be added. If your side account was linked to your main account with this new feature whenever you logged onto any of the accounts in the link it would register as you logged into all of them.

dragonnn • 31 July 2015 at 12:20 AM

I say no to the account purging in general.

Regardless, side accounts need to be linked to main accounts ( I believe they still aren't). I never log in to my immortal storage account unless I'm transferring immortals over. I have no desire to face a purge penalty because I didn't sign in to my own...

netherling • 30 July 2015 at 11:28 PM

@aquari
Some people are trying to find alternatives, I guess that's how it came up. The main points on both sides are:

Non-supporters: we spent a good amount of money on creatures and don't want that to be wasted.

Supporters: prices for creatures are super high and its harder to get them now bec...

dawnfur • 30 July 2015 at 11:20 PM

@aquari

The inactive thing came as a compromise for not rereleasing. 😋

aquari • 30 July 2015 at 11:18 PM

@ami_utsukushii yea I understand and is unfortunate, but they do have what they paid for it cannot be helped -cannot stop or force them - if their an active user

I actually just looked at the first page and I don't know how the argument of inactive users poped up. The actual question is should r...

netherling • 30 July 2015 at 11:08 PM

@aquari
If there is a small chance, there needs to be like.... A rule to it. It just occurred to me like...what if a user has like...(unrealistically) about seven or eight of an old cash shop creature. If they get another one they shouldn't keep it because like, they already have a lot more than ot...